"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
10/12/2016 at 18:02 • Filed to: None
5
7|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
10/12/2016 at 18:02 • Filed to: None | 5
| 7 |
For Sweden
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/12/2016 at 18:03 |
|
I wouldn’t want to stand next to a Fiat either
S65
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/12/2016 at 18:06 |
|
Much learn
Berang
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/12/2016 at 18:17 |
|
That looks like it might be Ken Bone’s car.
DynamicWeight
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/12/2016 at 18:26 |
|
I feel like it’s smirking.
HFV has no HFV. But somehow has 2 motorcycles
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/12/2016 at 18:44 |
|
Obviously the diagonal yellow lines indicate that you should park there.
Stephenson Valve Gear
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/12/2016 at 21:20 |
|
If I’m looking at this correctly - and that isn’t guaranteed at all - I’m going to award extra points for the front of the car being in the “No Parking” area, the back wheels being in an actual parking space (albeit 90 degrees off the intended orientation) and the back bumper fouling yet another parking spot. That is a very well done horrible parking job.
|
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Stephenson Valve Gear
10/12/2016 at 22:11 |
|
Your analysis is 100% correct.